RFC: CSS Level 2.1 or CSS Level 3?
Reported by Matias Korhonen | August 10th, 2009 @ 09:50 PM | in 0.5.5 (Bug fix galore)
Should we be using CSS3?
CSS3 includes some nive new attributes and properties, such as min-width/max-width, overflow-x/overflow-y, and so forth.
Prior to what I thought before, CSS3 also includes the vendor specific extensions (-moz, -webkit, -khtml, etc): http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-css3-syntax-20030813/#vendor-specific
Please comment.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Joao Carlos August 20th, 2009 @ 08:15 PM
- Assigned user set to “Matias Korhonen”
-
Matias Korhonen August 21st, 2009 @ 06:09 PM
- Title changed from “CSS Level 2.1 or CSS Level 3?” to “RFC: CSS Level 2.1 or CSS Level 3?”
-
Matias Korhonen August 21st, 2009 @ 06:47 PM
- State changed from “new” to “resolved”
I say CSS 3. It has enough advantages to justify it.
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create new ticket
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
Ruby on Rails web application for the HAAGA-HELIA Linux Club.
Joao Carlos
Matias Korhonen